Forest Service Backs Alta Snowboarder Ban | Asks Judge to Dismiss Case

SnowBrains |
Devil’s Castle.  Alta, UT.  photo: MelYW
Devil’s Castle. Alta, UT. photo: MelYW

The Forest Service has stepped into the Four Snowboarders vs. Alta lawsuit over the ‘unconstitutional’ ban of snowboarding from Alta, and has asked the judge to dismiss the lawsuit against Alta. In January four boarders banded together to create Wasatch Equality, a nonprofit organization, and filed a lawsuit against Alta for violating the 14th amendment.

The 14th amendment was created to protect certain classes of people from discrimination. Classes of people in the 14th amendment are defined by:

  • Age
  • Disability
  • Equal Pay/Compensation
  • Genetic Information
  • Harassment
  • National Origin
  • Pregnancy
  • Race/Color
  • Religion
  • Retaliation
  • Sex
  • Sexual Harassment

Unfortunately for the boarders, snowboarders are not a protected class of people according to the 14th amendment.

welcometoaltaWelcome to Alta. photo: opensnow.com

The Forest Service said that Alta has rational reasons for banning snowboarders. The resort’s approved operating plan gives it the right to exclude any skiing device deemed a harmful risk to snow quality or not consistent with its business decisions.

The Forest Service went on to say that “…due to federal immunity, the court does not have jurisdiction to hear the case.” The snowboarders failed to show any mutual interest between Alta and the USFS for banning snowboarding from the area. The USFS pointed out that of over 100 ski areas in 13 states on USFS land only Alta bans snowboarding. On these grounds the Forest Service has asked the federal judge to dismiss the case. If the case is thrown out, this will be along the lines of a legal routing for the snowboarders.

For the time being, Alta will stay Alta. At a certain point, being a skier’s only mountain is a deep part of what Alta is about and a seriously radical change would be needed to change this.

What’s your take on this?


Related Articles

7 thoughts on “Forest Service Backs Alta Snowboarder Ban | Asks Judge to Dismiss Case

  1. Snowboarders are half blind on the mountain, that makes them a risk to other skiers and themselves. Almost got hit by one of the bastards today from above as he tried to drop into my line!

  2. As a snowboarder who lives in California I couldn’t care less, let them have their mountain. What bothers me is when skiers use this as an example to bash the behaviors of snowboarders when in reality i’m sure there are douches on both sides of the fence.

  3. When #Freealpine, they can ban snowboarders from Alpine as well. Hey slide down too many slopes without turning and cut across slopes ruining it for those that want to ski the fall line.

    1. And what about the boarder trying to get air that landed on the little girl at the bottom of Palisades at Alpine yesterday. They took her to the hospital for observation. Fortunately, she did not break anything.

  4. Oh yes, keep those snowboarders out!
    Alta should be the last bastion of “two boards upon cold powder snow yo ho!”
    Honestly don’t you boarders have any where else to ride?
    You must be bored to take on a law suit like this. Explore new horizons dudes!

Got an opinion? Let us know...