
The NOAA released its monthly outlook for January 2026 today. Below is a summary for those unfamiliar with meteorological terminology, and the full discussion further down for those who are.
TL;DR – January 2026 favors a classic weak La Niña setup: colder, stormier conditions and better snow odds for the Pacific Northwest, Northern Rockies, Great Lakes, and western Alaska, with more warmth and dryness across the Southwest, southern Rockies, southern Plains, Southeast, and southern Appalachians. The central Rockies, much of California, the Northwest coast, and New England sit in a higher-uncertainty “wild card” zone where small shifts in the storm track could swing snowfall either way.
- Related: SnowBrains Winter 2025-26 Forecast: Month-by-Month and Region-by-Region — Where it’s Going to Snow This Winter
- Related: Farmers’ Almanac Winter 2025-26 Forecast: Cold and Snowy Winter Ahead. But Where?
- Related: NOAA Winter 2025-26 Forecast: Nor’easters and Pacific Powder—This is Where it Will Snow
Can the West’s season be saved? For January, the pattern still looks like a weak La Niña, which means the northern half of the western U.S. has the best chance of salvaging a slow start, while the southern half faces a steeper uphill battle. The Pacific Northwest and Northern Rockies (Cascades, Idaho ranges, northwest Montana, and Wyoming) lean wetter than normal with at least seasonable temperatures, a classic setup for rebuilding snowpack if the storm track locks in for a few solid cycles. Farther south in the Sierra Nevada, Tetons, Wasatch, and much of Colorado, the outlook is essentially a toss‑up on both temperatures and precipitation, so the season can still be rescued there, but only if a few key January storm windows happen to focus on these mountains rather than staying farther north. The toughest recovery prospects are in the Southwest and southern Rockies, including New Mexico and Arizona, where the odds favor warmer, drier than normal conditions, meaning resorts will likely need well‑timed colder troughs to break the pattern; without those, it is harder to erase the early deficit.
January 2026 Outlook
For January 2026, a weak La Niña pattern favors colder, stormier conditions in northern and northwestern ski regions, with warmer, generally drier weather across much of the southern U.S. mountains. Equal-chance zones in parts of the West, central U.S., and New England indicate higher-than-usual uncertainty so storm-track swings could make or break local snow totals.
Temperature
For the Pacific Northwest and Northern Rockies (Washington Cascades, Oregon Cascades, Idaho, and northwest Montana ranges), odds lean a bit cooler than normal from the Northern Rockies into the Upper Mississippi Valley, but much of the immediate Northwest and northern California sits in an “equal chances” band, meaning no strong tilt toward colder or warmer than average. If the jet stream dips south at times, these zones could still see classic La Niña cold shots and good snow, but guidance is mixed enough that forecasters did not commit to a clear cold signal west of the Continental Divide.
Across the Tetons, Wasatch, Colorado Rockies, and interior Southwest ranges, the temperature outlook is essentially neutral, with equal chances of above-, near-, or below-normal temperatures from much of Utah and Colorado into the central Plains. That reflects the potential for both mild spells and occasional Arctic intrusions pushing south, a hallmark risk in weak La Niña winters, so ski areas here should expect a variable month rather than a locked-in pattern.
For the Southern Rockies, Southern Plains, and southern Appalachians, there is a strong tilt toward warmer-than-normal conditions, with probabilities of 50–60% for above-normal temperatures across southern New Mexico, Texas, Louisiana, Florida, and along the Gulf Coast into the Southeast. This warmer signal stretches into parts of the southern Appalachians and Mid-Atlantic, suggesting more rain–snow line issues at lower elevations and a greater premium on higher, colder terrain for reliable snow.
In Alaska, much of the mainland and all of Southeast Alaska are expected to be colder than normal, with the highest odds (around 50–60%) in Southeast and adjacent mainland areas. Western and northern coastal Alaska fall into an equal-chances category, as early-to mid-January guidance leans slightly cold but is complicated by sea ice and longer-term warming trends.
Precipitation
Above-normal precipitation is favored across the Pacific Northwest and Northern Rockies, including the Washington and Oregon Cascades, the Idaho ranges, and much of western Montana and Wyoming. Some seasonal model suites had hinted at drier conditions along the West Coast. Still, newer guidance and week 3–4 forecasts indicate a strong wet signal over the Northwest, so forecasters have shrunk the dry area back toward southeastern California.
In the Sierra Nevada and most of California, forecasters went with “equal chances” for precipitation across much of the state, reflecting uncertainty in how far south the storm track will extend. Southeastern California retains a weak tilt toward below-normal precipitation, so southern Sierra and southern California resorts remain more vulnerable if the moisture plume stays focused farther north.
For the central and southern Rockies and the interior Southwest (Utah, Colorado, Arizona, New Mexico), odds favor drier-than-normal conditions across the broader Southwest and Southern Plains. This includes many Four Corners and southern Rockies resorts, where La Niña often shunts the main storm track to the north, so snowfall may depend on a few well-timed systems rather than frequent waves.
Across the Great Lakes, Upper Midwest, and Ohio/Middle Mississippi Valleys, above-normal precipitation is favored, with a notable wet corridor from the Great Lakes through the Ohio Valley into parts of the Middle and Lower Mississippi and Tennessee Valleys. For ski areas around the Upper Midwest and interior Northeast that can tap into lake-effect and synoptic snow, this pattern often translates into frequent storm opportunities. However, exact snow-versus-rain outcomes will hinge on local temperature swings in surrounding equal-chance zones.
In the Southeast and southern Appalachians, a broad swath from the southern Plains across the Gulf Coast states into much of the Southeast is expected to be drier than normal, consistent with classic La Niña behavior. Lower-elevation ski areas in this belt may face fewer winter storms and more marginal events. At the same time, higher Appalachian resorts on the northern edge of the dry, warm anomalies will be sensitive to small shifts in the storm track, which could occasionally boost snow despite the overall drier signal.
For Alaska, western mainland Alaska leans toward wetter-than-normal conditions, while the southern coast and Southeast Alaska show a weak but consistent tilt toward below-normal precipitation driven by La Niña and long-term trends. That combination—colder but somewhat drier in the southeast, and wetter in the west—means snow prospects are strongest for western Alaskan mountains, with more uncertainty for Southeast coastal ski zones that depend on frequent Pacific storms.

The full discussion is below:
30-DAY OUTLOOK DISCUSSION FOR JANUARY 2026 The January 2026 Monthly Temperature and Precipitation Outlooks are constructed by considering the La Niña base state, as well as dynamical climate models and integrated statistical tools. Equatorial sea surface temperatures (SSTs) remain below average across the Central and East-Central Pacific Ocean, with SST departures in the Niño 3.4 region reaching -0.7 degrees C. These below-average SSTs have persisted since September 2025, and we are firmly within weak La Niña territory. Furthermore, atmospheric anomalies over the tropical Pacific Ocean are consistent with La Niña, consequently, we expect La Niña teleconnections during January 2026. In contrast, the Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) remains more uncertain, as models suggest destructive interference from a strong Kelvin Wave may hinder its re-emergence. The January 2026 Outlooks are primarily shaped by the La Niña background state, dynamical climate models, local SST anomalies, sea ice, and land surface conditions (where appropriate). An experimental multiple linear regression (MLR) tool which estimates the influences of the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO), MJO, and decadal trends is utilized, as is a consolidation that includes influence of ENSO, decadal trends, and calibrated North American Multi-Model Ensemble (NMME) output. Weeks 3-4 forecasts from the Global Ensemble Forecast System version 12 (GEFSv12), the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), and Coupled Forecast System version 2 (CFSv2) models that cover the period to about mid-January were also considered. Impacts from the MJO, along with land surface variables such as snow cover, will be re-evaluated at the end of the month for the updated version of this Outlook. The January 2026 Temperature Outlook features increased chances of below-normal temperatures for much of Mainland Alaska, all of Southeast Alaska, and stretching from the Northern Rockies to the Upper Mississippi Valley. Above-normal temperatures are more likely for the Southern Tier of the Contiguous United States (CONUS), covering much of the Southwest, Four Corners, Southern Plains, Southeast, and Mid-Atlantic. Equal Chances (EC) of above-, near-, and below-normal temperatures are forecast for Western and Northern Alaska, the Northwest, much of Northern and Central California, the Central Plains, Great Lakes, and New England. A mid-level height pattern typical of La Niña has been established and is forecast to persist into at least mid-January per week 3-4 dynamical models . A blocking high has been a significant feature over the North Pacific and Aleutians, with downstream mid-level low pressure residing over eastern Alaska and portions of the Northwest. Above-average mid-level heights cover much of the Southern Tier and Eastern CONUS. The pattern reflected in the January 2026 Temperature Outlooks is consistent with La Niña expectations, though it has been modified based on available guidance. Probabilities for below-normal temperatures are highest over Southeast Alaska and adjacent areas of southeastern Mainland Alaska, reaching 50 to 60%, given consistency among various tools. Monthly forecasts for Alaska from NMME, C3S, and CFSv2 align with shorter-term week 3-4 forecasts in favoring these cooler conditions. Probabilities are also enhanced, reaching 50 to 60%, over Southern New Mexico, Texas, Louisiana, and Florida. This is driven by strong agreement between dynamical models and higher-probability signals in the shorter-term week 3-4 forecasts. While decadal trends and certain tools like the CFSv2 tilt toward above-normal temperatures over the Northern Coast of Alaska, EC is indicated because early to mid-January is forecast to be at least slightly below-normal, and sea ice is present along the coast. Similarly, while La Niña often brings below-normal temperatures to the Northern Tier of the CONUS, sometimes including the Northwest, the NMME, C3S, and CFSv2 monthly outlooks are generally above-normal along the western third of the country. Furthermore, should the MJO become more coherent, it could introduce more variability, such as cooler temperatures in the West, though this influence is currently highly uncertain. EC is thus favored over much of the West and Northwest as we cannot discount the possibility of cooler air extending further West and South. Similarly, models are warm over the central CONUS, however, it is not unheard of during January and La Niña years to see cold air intrusions reach further South, as such we tilt toward EC over the central CONUS and will re-assess in the monthly update. In addition, uncertainty is high in the central CONUS in a consolidation of statistical tools (which include influence of trend and ENSO), and NMME, which adds to our uncertainty here. Finally, guidance was mixed and inconsistent over the Great Lakes and New England, which also led to a tilt toward EC. Because this La Niña is currently weak, increased variability and uncertainty are possible for some regions, which also supports EC. While some regions in the January Temperature Outlook remain uncertain due to the variability of weak La Niña teleconnections, the precipitation pattern is more consistent across various tools, closely resembling the expected La Niña signature. Above-normal precipitation is favored for the Northwest, Northern Rockies, Great Lakes, and much of the Ohio and Middle Mississippi Valleys. Western Alaska also leans above-normal. Drier conditions are more likely across the Southwest, Southern Plains, and much of the Southeast. A weak tilt toward below-normal precipitation is also indicated over much of the southern coast of Mainland Alaska and all of Southeast Alaska. While the NMME and C3S favor below-normal precipitation up much of the West Coast, reaching into the Northwest in some models, recent forecasts from CFSv2 tilt above-normal for the month of January over the Northwest. Moreover, week 3 and week 4 dynamical models forecast at least 40 to 50% chances of above-normal precipitation over the Northwest. As such, we have minimized the region of below-normal precipitation forecast by some of the multi-model ensembles, confining it more to southeastern California. Given the uncertainty regarding how far South the moisture may reach, much of California is designated as EC. Above-normal precipitation is also indicated for the Great Lakes, Ohio Valley, and parts of the Middle and Lower Mississippi Valleys and the Tennessee Valley , which is a typical La Niña signature. These two areas of above-normal precipitation are connected by a weak (33 to 40%) chance of above-normal precipitation that is supported by the NMME and C3S. The below-normal precipitation favored over the southern tier is consistent with models and La Niña, though some uncertainty exists over parts of Texas and Louisiana as it is currently unclear how far south any above-normal precipitation might reach. Finally, over Alaska, decadal trends and La Niña support the forecast for below-normal precipitation over the southern coast of the Mainland and Southeast Alaska, while dynamical models like the NMME, C3S, and CFSv2 favor above-normal precipitation for much of the western Mainland.