CAIC: Why Early Season Snow is Dangerous in Colorado

SnowBrains | | Post Tag for AvalancheAvalanche
April 20th, 2013 avalanche that killed 5 people slid on a depth hoar layer from November 2012. Credit: CAIC

The Colorado Avalanche Information Center released an early-season snow update on its blog a few years ago, which still holds true today. The message is one of warning; big early-season snowfall will affect the layers of snow that will fall on top of this one for the rest of this coming winter season.

CAIC: Early Season Snow

By Brian Lazar and Blase Reardon/Colorado Avalanche Information Center

Fall snow in the mountains โ€“ white snow bannered between blue sky and golden aspens. What to make of it? Maybe you hear people bemoaning it as a sign that their biking, climbing, fishing, or gardening seasons are coming to an end. Maybe you hear others extolling it as the promise of a powder-filled winter ahead. Maybe you hear grizzled veterans grumbling that itโ€™s too early and weโ€™re on the road to developing our first unpredictable and potentially dangerous weak layer. Letโ€™s consider that last response and outline some tips on how to deal with that issue.

The fall snow is shallow. Thatโ€™s its most significant feature. Itโ€™s susceptible to melting or weakening, and both processes can have long-term effects on snowpack development and avalanche conditions as the winter progresses. The outcomes depend on future weather.

Melting:

A combination of radiation and heat can melt the early-season snow. Sunny slopes are the first to melt off. If temperatures are warm enough, even shady slopes can melt back to bare ground. A prolonged spell of sunny, warm weather will leave slopes (especially those receiving direct sun) bare of snow or dotted with thin, discontinuous snow patches. This would a good thing from an avalanche perspective. It would mean subsequent snowfall will be falling on mostly bare ground, without preserving any weak layers at the bottom of the snowpack.

Weakening:

High-elevation shaded slopes arenโ€™t as impacted by radiation and often donโ€™t warm enough to melt snow. On these slopes, the thin snow cover lingers. Temperature gradients โ€“ in this case, the difference in temperature between the ground and the snow surface โ€“ can be very high. The temperature near the ground hovers near freezing. On the snow surface, itโ€™s generally colder, sometimes much colder. High temperature gradients promote faceting of the snow grains. With time, this thin layer of early-season snow can change into a weak layer of large-grained facets, a layer that collapses when sufficiently loaded. That weak layer will be at the base of any snowpack that accumulates above it. Thatโ€™s a bad thing.

Some of both:

If the radiation and heat arenโ€™t sustained, they might leave just a crust on the surface of a shallow snowpack. Crusts near the base of the snowpack are notorious for producing thin layers of facets that can persist for long periods. That means ongoing Persistent Slab avalanche problems if theyโ€™re buried. Some of our worst years for Deep Persistent Slab avalanches occurred when early-season snow first faceted and then melted just enough to cap the basal facets (depth hoar) with a thin crust. Neither of these scenarios is great for our avalanche future.

So, whatโ€™s a snow-lover to do at this point? Monitor the weather and snowpack from here on out. Below are some things to watch:

  • Snowline elevation: Put a number on the lowest elevation at which you see snow. Find some markers on a slope you can view regularly, compare them to a topographic map, and check the snowline against those markers. Once snow starts accumulating, youโ€™ll know the elevation above which you need to factor basal facets into your assessments. Or conversely, the elevation below which you donโ€™t.
  • Aspects: Be very conscious of the aspect of the slopes where you do and donโ€™t see snow. Use an online mapping tool or a compass to verify your impressions. Being able to differentiate slopes by aspect will again help you include basal facets in your assessments when theyโ€™re likely to be present. And deemphasize them when theyโ€™re not.
  • Snow surface: Youโ€™ll need firsthand info to determine whether a crust/ facet combination is developing. That can be opportunistic โ€“ checking for it if you are up high or asking people who have been โ€“ or planned.

Images of your favorite backcountry areas can serve as great references later. The most useful images are those taken just before the seasonโ€™s snow accumulates when you can see the distribution of any persistent old snow. Because itโ€™s hard to time that, take images whenever good weather allows.

These practices are focused on determining the distribution of potential weak layers. They donโ€™t tell us much about the actual layers. That we can learn once winter hits in earnest. For now, think โ€œwhere.โ€

At this point, weโ€™re hoping for one of a couple of scenarios:

  1. The snow on the ground now melts away back to bare ground. That way, we could start from scratch when weโ€™re more likely to get consistent snowfall.
  2. Bury this early season snow with more snow; lots of it and fast! Once we have snow on the ground that is likely to stick around, the more quickly and deeper we can accumulate more snow, the better in the long run. Weโ€™re hoping for a snowpack deep enough that temperature gradients arenโ€™t high enough to promote faceting/weakening of the snow on the ground.

Many places that picked up more than 1 or 2 feet of snow in early October now have enough snow to make scenario 1 unlikely. Scenario 2 doesnโ€™t look great either with the mid-range forecasts. That leaves us hoping we donโ€™t cap our currently faceting snowpack with a crust. Itโ€™s not the best way to start, but itโ€™s not the worst (yet).


Related Articles

Got an opinion? Let us know...