NASA: Turkey’s Glaciers Have Shrunken by Half

SnowBrains | | Post Tag for BrainsBrains

Turkish Glaciers Shrink By Half

NASA just wrote this article today about Turkey’s shrinking glaciers. ย Yes, Turkey has glacier and high peaks and their glacier half lost half of their collective mass since 1970. ย Turkey’s highest elevation is Mt. Ararat at 16,859′.

Turkey had 14 main glaciers in the 1970s and 5 of them have completely disappeared.

The skiing is good in Turkey. ย Armada sent a team of pros there in 2011. ย Here is their story/video:

 

NASA Article: ย Turkish Glaciers Shrink By Half

Researchers and citizens have known for some time that Turkeyโ€™s glaciers are shrinking. Now scientists have calculated the losses and found that more than half of the ice cover in this mountainous country has vanished since the 1970s. A team of researchers from Ege University (Turkey) and NASAโ€™s Goddard Space Flight Center analyzed four decades of Landsat satellite data to document this steady decline. The team, led by Dogukan Dogu Yavasli (Ege), published their results in June 2015 in the journal Remote Sensing of Environment.

The map above shows the proportional percent change of the 14 main Turkish glaciers that existed in the 1970s. Over 40 years, the total glacial area fell from 25 square kilometers (10 square miles) in the 1970s to 10.85 km2(4.19 mi2) in 2012-2013. Five of the glaciers have completely disappeared.

Today, two glaciers in eastern Turkey account for the majority of all glacial area in the country. Agri glacier sits atop Mount Agri, or Ararat, a dormant stratovolcano. Uludoruk is a fractured glacier in the Taurus Mountains that was likely one continuous glacier prior to its first documentation in 1842.

The average elevation of Turkey is more than 1,100 meters (3,600 feet), with the landscape rising from west to east. Glacier losses at lower elevations were larger over the study period.

To set the baseline for the extent of Turkeyโ€™s glaciers in the mid-1970s, the researchers relied heavily on an early glacier inventory assembled by Ajun Kurter for the landmark U.S. Geological Survey series Satellite Image Atlas of Glaciers of the World. (They also consulted two other glacier reports.) For the new study, Yavasli and colleagues examined 72 Landsat scenes collected between 1972 and 2013, as well as five images from the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) and 41 high-resolution commercial satellite images. They reconstructed the size of Turkeyโ€™s glaciers at five time periods between the 1970s and 2013.

Mount Sรผphan, a dormant stratovolcano and home to one of Turkeyโ€™s lesser glaciers, is shown below in a false-color Landsat 8 OLI image from summer 2014. (Note that vegetation is red in this image.) The glacier lost more than 75 percent of its area since the 1970s. The remaining glacier is small, fragmented, and covered by camouflaging debris. Researchers had to carefully separate snow cover from glacial ice for this study.

acquired July 14, 1973download large image (2 MB, JPEG, 1600×1600)
acquired July 14, 1973download GeoTIFF file (2 MB, TIFF, 1600×1600)

acquired August 12, 2014download large image (4 MB, JPEG, 3200×3200)
acquired August 12, 2014download GeoTIFF file (4 MB, TIFF, 3200×3200)

To make meaningful measurements and confirm the margins of small glaciers, Yavasli and colleagues compared medium-resolution Landsat data with high-resolution commercial data from IKONOS, Quickbird-2, GeoEye-1, and WorldView-1 and -2 collected between 2003โ€“2013. Information gleaned from these comparisons was then applied to the analysis of Landsat images collected prior to the launch of commercial, high-resolution satellites. As the researchers marched back in time through the Landsat record, they had to wrestle with less sophisticated onboard sensors and with coarser data. Again, where available, they use coincident data from different generations of Landsat sensors so that the interpretation advantages of the new sensors could help them decipher patterns in the older data.

The authors also analyzed precipitation, cloud cover, and temperature records to understand the causes of this dramatic drop in glacial area. They found no significant variation in precipitation or cloud cover, but surface temperatures did increase. In particular, there was an upward trend in summer nighttime minimum temperatures, leading the authors to conclude that elevated temperatures are the major factor behind the staggering ice losses.

NASA Earth Observatory map by Joshua Stevens, using data from a 2015 paper by YavaลŸlฤฑ, Tucker, and Melocikc. NASA Earth Observatory image by Jesse Allen, using Landsat data from the U.S. Geological Survey. Caption by Laura Rocchio, Landsat Communications Team.

Instrument(s):ย 
Landsat 1 (ERTS)
Landsat 8 – OLI

Related Articles

Got an opinion? Let us know...