Utah Avalanche Center has an interesting blog post on their site, titled ‘Avalanche Fatalities During Uphill Traveling‘.
According to their research, 30% of tourer fatalities occur when the skiers are ascending.ย Whilst most tourers, and indeed a lot of educational resources, focus on the dangers whilst descending, it is clear that more focus needs to be put on assessing terrain and conditions whilst climbing.
The entire post, recommended, is below:
Background
Years when the US averages 25 to 30 avalanche fatalities in a season, the particulars of each accident blur. ย However, in the winter of 2016-2017, when there were 12 avalanche fatalities, some interesting details stood out. ย One was the percentage of solo recreationists getting killed; the other was the relative number of people who were going uphill at the time of their accidents.
The risk of backcountry incidents and fatalities while descending is well known and is often the main focus of avalanche training and education. However, the risk while proceeding uphill is less known. This study investigated the incidence of avalanche fatalities that occurred while backcountry tourers were ascending.
Objective
We evaluated the proportion of avalanche fatalities that occurred among backcountry tourers and recreationists while proceeding uphill, relative to fatalities that occurred during descent.
Methods
We analyzed data on avalanche fatalities (source: Avalanche.org) for winter seasons 2009-2010 through November 2017. We focused on the avalanche fatalities of backcountry tourers and recreationists who spent a significant portion of their trip going uphill and excluded avalanche fatalities related to all other modes of travel (see Definitions). We then reviewed the subset of tourer data to determine if the tourers were proceeding uphill or downhill when the accidents happened.
Definitions
โTourersโ included backcountry skiers, snowboarders, snowshoers, and hikers, including those who used motorized means for a limited portion of their ascent. We excluded motorized users including snowmobilers, heliskiers/snowboarders, most climbers, most side-country skiers/snowboarders, and patrollers/forecasters caught in accidents while doing avalanche mitigation work.
We also defined a category called โUnknownโ, which included backcountry tourers or recreationists for whom the available information was insufficient for determining whether they were ascending or descending at the time of the accident.
Results
Of the 210 total fatalities from winter 2009-2010 through November 2017, we determined that 75 fatalities (36%) fit our criteria as backcountry tourers or recreationists who spent a significant part of their time going uphill.
Of the 75 tourer fatalities, 24 (32%) were proceeding uphill, and 42 (56%) were going downhill at the time of the incident. The remaining 9 (12%) were classified as โunknownโ due to insufficient information to make a determination. ย Reasons for classifying an accident as โunknownโ included lack of enough detailed information in the accident report to make a judgment, and lack of information in solo fatalities with no witnesses. Cornice accidents were particularly challenging to classify, when trying to determine if the accident โoccured before descent.โ ย Many of the cornice fatalities ended up in the โunknownโ category.
Conclusions
Backcountry travelers and avalanche education courses often tend to focus on the descent component of backcountry travel, yet in this study approximately โ of tourer fatalities in the U.S.–over more than eight seasons–occurred when tourers were ascending. These results suggest that backcountry travelers need to spend more time evaluating the terrain they are traveling through during their uphill travels. ย Also, backcountry travelers could benefit from avalanche education that includes a clear focus on uphill travel, in addition to the existing focus on descent.