La NiƱaāthe cool phase of the El NiƱo-Southern Oscillation climate patternāweakened over the past month, and forecasters expect a transition to neutral conditions in the next couple of months. Weāll check in with the tropical Pacific to see how things are going before continuing the journey into understanding winter daily temperature variability that I started in Decemberās post.
Current events
The sea surface temperature in the NiƱo-3.4 region in the tropical Pacific came in at 0.75 Ā°C (1.4 ĖF) cooler than the long-term average in January, according to ERSSTv5, our most consistent historical dataset.
This is the second month in a row that the NiƱo-3.4 anomaly (anomaly = ādifference from the long-term averageā) has weakened, but it still exceeds the La NiƱa threshold of -0.5 Ā°C. The most recent weekly NiƱo-3.4 anomaly, which comes from the OISST dataset, was just at that threshold, measuring -0.5 Ā°C. (Take a look at Tomās post for more details on the various datasets we use to track temperatures in the Pacific.)
Weekly measurements tend to bounce around (weather!), while ENSO is a seasonal pattern (climate!). Therefore, we wonāt declare La NiƱa is over the moment the weekly value crosses the thresholdāweāll wait to be sure that the monthly average anomaly is in the neutral range (between -0.5 Ā°C and 0.5 Ā°C). The last time neutral conditions were present was in the summer of 2021.
The atmospheric response to La NiƱaās cooler-than-average ocean surface is an amped-up Walker circulation: stronger trade winds, stronger westerly (west-to-east) winds high up in the atmosphere, more rain and clouds than average over the far western Pacific, and drier conditions over the east/central Pacific. All of these characteristics were evident through January, indicating that the atmosphere is still reflecting La NiƱa.
Whatās next??
Okay, okay, so La NiƱa is still here. But forecasters expect that a change is imminent, with an 85% chance that the FebruaryāApril period will be neutral. This is based on the consensus of our computer models and bolstered by some physical observations, including the weakening oceanic anomalies at the surface and subsurface.
The subsurface provides a source for the surface. If there were still a lot of cooler water under the surface, we might be more hesitant to conclude that the transition to neutral conditions would happen soon. But as the animation above shows, the cold pool is getting smaller.
But will the neutral conditions we expect for spring precede an El NiƱo?? Tell us what we really want to know! Currently, El NiƱo has odds of about 60% for next fallāand after three La NiƱa winters in a row, it might seem inevitableābut there are some factors that provide uncertainty. Thereās our old friend, the spring predictability barrier. Forecasts made in the spring tend to have lower accuracy, at least in part because spring is a time of transition for ENSO (other possible factors are still being explored), making it harder for models to get a grip on what direction things are going.
Also, the wide range of potential outcomes from the models (shown below) tells us that there is still a lot of uncertainty.
Each line in that graph shows a possible scenario for next fall and winter. The scenarios begin to diverge for two main reasons: the differences in how each model simulates certain small-scale physical processes and, for a given model, the very-slightly-different starting input that accounts for the fact that we can never observe the current state of the climate system perfectly. The predictions span from strong El NiƱo to (gasp!) a 4th-year La NiƱa. These extreme scenarios are unlikely, though, and the majority of the forecasts are in the neutral to moderate-El NiƱo range. More on climate models in this post.
In summary: La NiƱa is waning, and confidence is high that neutral conditions will be in place soon and will last through the spring and early summer. Chances for El NiƱo next fall are increasing, but weāll have a better picture as we progress through and past the spring predictability barrier.
Daily temperature variability or bust!
To recap: over the last couple of posts, Iāve been looking into how ENSO affects the range of daily temperatures within a season. When it comes to ENSO impacts, we usually talk about the seasonal average temperature, butāas vividly illustrated by the two extreme cold-air outbreaks in the U.S. this winterādaily temperature is how we experience weather. So I examined the variability or range of daily temperature each winter over 1950ā2020 and then checked if the range of variability was different in El NiƱo winters or La NiƱa winters compared to neutral winters. Details of my analysis are in the footnotes.
In December, I showed that the range of daily average temperature is wider during La NiƱa winters than during El NiƱo winters in nearly all of North America. The only geographic exceptions are the north-central region of the continent, Florida, and southern Mexico, all of which have lower variability during La NiƱa and higher variability during El NiƱo winters.
Then, in January, I checked out the average range of daily minimum and maximumĀ temperatures. It turned out that there is a very wide range of daily minimum temperatures (usually the overnight low temperature) in the center of the continent, with less variability toward the coasts, especially the Southwest. Looking at daily maximums (usually the daytime high), we found that there was less variability overall than with the minimum, except for the subtropical regions.
Breaking down the patterns into ENSO phase, the first thing we can say is that El NiƱo and La NiƱa have approximately opposite effects on both daily maximum and daily minimum, much as they did on the average temperature variability I showed in December. Where El NiƱo reduces variability, La NiƱa increases it, and vice-versa.
However, things are a little noisier than those average daily patterns were. This is expected; any time you get into more granular dataāwhether youāre talking about area or time spanāyour results get noisier. (Another example of this is the weekly vs. monthly sea surface temperature I talked about above.) Iāll make a few quick observations about these maps but leave you to compare them for your hometown or other areas of interest.
Looking first at the maps for La NiƱa winters, we find that much of the U.S. and Alaska experience an increased range of daily lows. The pattern of La NiƱaās impact on the daily high temperature range is somewhat different, with variability decreasing in the northern half of the U.S. and increasing in the Southeast. However, there are some regions where both daily highs and daily lows change the same way during La NiƱa winters (increased range in the Southeast and in Alaska).
During El NiƱo, the range of daily low temperature is substantially reduced across most of the U.S. and Alaska. The range of daily highs, however, is slightly expanded or only slightly reduced over the U.S.
Thatās all thereās space for this month. What ideas do you have for why these patterns vary the way they do? Let us know in the comments! Then next month, Iāll wrap things up with some explanations and thoughts about ENSOās impact on daily temperature. Until then, stay cozy!
Footnote
Details on the analysis:
- The maps show the standard deviation of daily maximum or minimum temperature for each winter averaged over all winters 1950ā2020 and the averages for La NiƱa and El NiƱo winters, as determined by the Oceanic NiƱo Index.
- Daily temperature data: I used Berkeley Earth daily average temperature dataset. Itās also available here.
- Years included: 1950ā2020. Berkeley Earth is available through near-present, but the data I downloaded ended in 2020. Iāll update with 2021ā2022, but I donāt expect the overall results to change.
- Programming language: I used Python. Jupyter notebooks available upon request.
This post first appeared on the climate.gov ENSO blog and was written by Emily Becker.